Difference between revisions of "1993-1103-NCSU-Chapel-Hill-video"

From Direct-Mind.Org

(Video collection)
(Add data template and Auto-AI status)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Category:DVD]]
[[Category:DVD]]
[[Category:North Carolina]]
[[Category:North Carolina]]
[[Category:Auto-AI]]
<div id="widthlimiter">
<div id="widthlimiter">


== Data Template ==
<!-- note, the page title is drawn in automatically via the template -->
{{Recording Data
|record-date          = November 3, 1993
|location            = NC State University This was Chapel Hill, should be Raleigh
|number-tapes        =
|source              = SN and video from P.C.
|other-recorders      = Have tapes and video.
|other-versions      =
|dvd-number          =
|number-mp3s          = SN 5 mp3 including "0" the introduction. Ripped video gave 3 mp3 files.
|total-time          =
|transcription-status = Auto-AI at Rev.Com Nov 19, 2025
|distribution-link    = 
|distribution-pdf    =
|published-book      =
|published-website    =
|remarks              =
|audio-quality        =
|who-is-present      =
|url-direct-mind      =
|}}
== Notes ==
=== Video collection in general ===
=== Video collection in general ===
Have DVDs ripped to VOB and/or VHS ripped to MP4. Need to verify collection.  Have on Terastation (backup server) and Dropbox. Plus the originals in a plastic box.
Have DVDs ripped to VOB and/or VHS ripped to MP4. Need to verify collection.  Have on Terastation (backup server) and Dropbox. Plus the originals in a plastic box.


Line 23: Line 48:


So on this one - RR-unc-chapel-hill-1993-1103 you're saying that your DVD was 1st generation from tape, and if you made a direct copy of that DVD to the copy you sent me - that probably wouldn't cause a loss in fidelity, if done by simple disk-copy. So what you sent me was probably the best we will have - and any improvement to the file you just downloaded would be up to me - if I can reduce my 5-step process to a 1-step process.
So on this one - RR-unc-chapel-hill-1993-1103 you're saying that your DVD was 1st generation from tape, and if you made a direct copy of that DVD to the copy you sent me - that probably wouldn't cause a loss in fidelity, if done by simple disk-copy. So what you sent me was probably the best we will have - and any improvement to the file you just downloaded would be up to me - if I can reduce my 5-step process to a 1-step process.
== Transcription ==
=== File 0 - intro ===
=== File 1, 2, etc ===
</div>

Revision as of 00:08, 20 November 2025

Return to list of all Recordings     See all Categories    Spreadsheet: Recordings-Source-List

Metadata repository: https://data.direct-mind.org/

Data Template

Title 1993-1103-NCSU-Chapel-Hill-video
Recorded date November 3, 1993
Location NC State University This was Chapel Hill, should be Raleigh
Number of tapes
Other recorders audible? Have tapes and video.
Alternate versions exist?
Source SN and video from P.C.
No. of MP3 files SN 5 mp3 including "0" the introduction. Ripped video gave 3 mp3 files.
Total time
Transcription status Auto-AI at Rev.Com Nov 19, 2025
Working directory all versions https://distribution.direct-mind.org/ (need password)
Latest version in PDF by title https://www.direct-mind.org/pdf/ Finished: https://selfdefinition.org/rose/
Published in what book?
Published on which website?
Remarks
Audio quality
Identifiable voices
URL at direct-mind.org https://www.direct-mind.org/index.php/1993-1103-NCSU-Chapel-Hill-video
For access to this wiki or the audio files please send an email to: editors@direct-mind.org
Revision timestamp 20251120000818

Notes

Video collection in general

Have DVDs ripped to VOB and/or VHS ripped to MP4. Need to verify collection. Have on Terastation (backup server) and Dropbox. Plus the originals in a plastic box.

Email

See long email chain January 2012:

RE: RR videos on VHS tapes

Phil: I actually kept--and found--the old VHS tapes. ...

Then a long chain.

Email SH to PC

So on this one - RR-unc-chapel-hill-1993-1103 you're saying that your DVD was 1st generation from tape, and if you made a direct copy of that DVD to the copy you sent me - that probably wouldn't cause a loss in fidelity, if done by simple disk-copy. So what you sent me was probably the best we will have - and any improvement to the file you just downloaded would be up to me - if I can reduce my 5-step process to a 1-step process.

Transcription

File 0 - intro

File 1, 2, etc